How does Webers concept of status group challenge Marxs views on Essay

How does webers concept of status group challenge Marxs views on polarization of housees in societies - Essay ExampleFor Marx, society is not merely a collection of separate, competing individuals, although that is the appearance that capitalist society presents. Throughout history societies have divided into competing classes, defined structurally and economically in terms of their relationship to the content of production. In the Communist Manifesto Marx and Engels comment thatthe history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. (Bottomore, 1983, p. 75). Thus, he viewed the bourgeoisie as the geters, and the proletariat as the non-owners, of the means of production. Marx believed that capitalist society was increasingly becoming polarized into two great opposed camps of bourgeois and proletarians, which is destined to lead to conflict among these classes. Through its own instruments of development, it is bound to give rise ultimately to its own dissolu tion--to a revolution that will result in the overthrow of capitalism and to the creation of a collectivized order. The conquest of political power by the working class will lead, firstly, to the creation of a socialist state--a state in which the working class is the popular opinion class and which functions in the interests of the working class. Thus, the dictatorship of the proletariat will replace the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. By the term dictatorial, Marx does not indicate that such(prenominal) states have a dictatorial political form, but rather that they rule in the interests of a particular class. However, the dictatorship of the proletariat is only the first shape of post-capitalist era. Its ultimate aim is to abolish the private ownership of the means of production, and hence the social and economic basis of class divisions. In addition, Marx believed that the rise of...(Giddens, 1971, p. 37).Weber notes that there is class conscious organization where (a) there are no groups between the real adversaries, (b) large numbers of persons are in the same class situation, (c) it is technically easy to organize those in the common class situation, and (d) where the goals of the class are well understood, and this understanding is led by those outside the class (intelligentsia). (Giddens and Held, p. 72)